It's a sad story, really. World-famous megasuperstar actor becomes smitten
with a best-selling science-fiction novel during his down and out days. Said
world-famous megasuperstar actor acquires the rights to film this novel and
toils for years at his craft, continuing to develop the project even as he
struggles to gain the leverage in Hollywood to get this movie made. Finally,
he has the leverage, and he has the script--but he also only has a scant
budget to produce what is essentially a summer blockbuster.
So he scrapes together a crew of gifted, intense talents, all of whom throw
themselves full tilt into the production. These people bust their asses for
this movie, and for the megasuperstar. Essentially, they buy into his dream:
to see this best-selling sci-fi novel hit the screen with as much passion
and integrity as possible. They toil, they slave, they spend months in
Montreal, Canada's armpit. The movie becomes more than just your average
production--it must have been more like a crusade. Everyone involved with
the film invokes the unholy fire of the cast and crew's unity in interviews,
tossing about such rarely-heard buzzwords as "masterpiece" and "Star
Wars."
There's no happy ending to this story. In spite of the cast and crew's
passionate dedication to the project, Battlefield Earth is a bad
film. And despite his own best intentions, John Travolta is awful in it. All
of the rumored $50 million budget is on the screen, and sometimes even the
production's raw energy seeps onto the screen too, somewhere just behind the
action--you can really feel the good intentions beaming forth in every shot.
But those are the things that pave the road to Hell, which might very well
lead you straight to a multiplex showing only Battlefield Earth.
Okay, so it's not that bad, but it's pretty awful. The story is a muddled
adaptation of the book--one thousand years into Earth's future, Jonnie
Goodboy Tyler (Barry Pepper) leaves his small clan of human survivors to
find a better way of life, and runs headlong into Terl (Travolta), the
conniving chief of security for the Psychlos, an alien race who conquered
the planet in just under ten minutes and obliterated most of humanity. Terl
has been trapped on Earth and is scheming to use humans as slaves to mine
gold, which he'll then send back to Psychlo--though why he'd do that when he
potentially may be stuck working on Earth for many years to come, we'll
never know.
At least in the book, Terl's explained as having one more ten-year tour of
duty to serve, and it's understood that he'll return to Psychlo and make
good use of his gold. In the movie, no such explanation is offered. That's
just one example of the convoluted adaptation by screenwriter Corey
Mandel--though L. Ron Hubbard's novel works well as a vibrant
action-adventure with some interesting characterizations, the film is
largely confusing and lacks any compelling characteristics. The plot is
uninteresting, the characters are threadbare at best. Even the cardinal rule
of any good sci-fi actioner--that above all, you HAVE to explain precisely
how the good guys will defeat the bad guys in the big climax--is flagrantly
disregarded. All this stuff happens in the film's extended ending and half
of it is inexplicable, some truly false drama. The other half is just
boring, because with no interesting characters, who really gives a shit,
anyway?
That's the biggest problem with Battlefield Earth: it's drop-dead
boring. Occasionally, there are moments of campy awfulness, most of them
stemming from Travolta's performance. He plays Terl like a high school kid
might play Falstaff in Henry IV; it's way over the top and silly. But
when you're not laughing at Travolta unintentionally hamming it up, you're
bored stiff. That's a shame, because it's clear that everyone tried really
hard and wanted to make a really good sci-fi movie from a really good sci-fi
book. Sadly, they failed with Battlefield Earth. Better luck next
time, I guess.