This year, December is the month for major studio film releases driven by the ego and hit-making power of high-profile directors.
On Christmas Day, Quentin Tarantino attempts to overcome the "junior slump" with his Elmore Leonard
adaptation, "Jackie Brown." On December 19, James Cameron will finally unveil his $260 million
dollar disaster...um, make that disaster FILM, "Titanic." And on December 13, Steven Spielberg
released his second film of 1997, the "serious" complement to his summer hit "The Lost World,"
"Amistad." Here's hoping that Cameron and Tarantino have more to offer than Spielberg
does.
As the product of a dominating powerhouse director, the
credit or blame for "Amistad" can be placed almost exclusively on Spielberg's shoulders. Since
this
also happens to be his first film created exclusively for his new studio, Dreamworks SKG (which
he
runs alongside fellow Hollywood A-listers Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen), the pressure
and
expectations are exponentially increased. Were Spielberg the kind of man prone to sweating, I'm
sure
he would have done plenty of it late last week. Somehow, I suspect he doesn't sweat much,
which
is precisely the problem with all of his recent films, especially "Amistad."
The man doesn't know how to take RISKS anymore.
Instead
of maintaining the standards of his late seventies and eighties work, when he was the master of
surprise and invention, Spielberg has become a master of the obvious. In his nineties work, no
emotion or response is left to the audience; each is carefully programmed into a film's text through
careful manipulation of the film language. When one is dealing with a juiced-up summer
blockbuster
like "The Lost World," programming in plenty of "oohs," "ahhs," and even an "EEK!" or two is
expected. But in applying the same directing style to "Amistad," Spielberg has committed a huge
artistic error.
"Amistad" is crammed full of obvious
"Oscar shots" engineered to elicit emotions from audiences and tiny gasps from award
nominating bodies across the nation. From the fake tension of the opening sequence chronicling
the
mutiny aboard the slave ship to the visual motifs that are hammered into a viewer's eyeballs time
and
again, "Amistad" approaches its story and subject with all the subtlety of a jackhammer in a
church.
As a result, Spielberg for the first time in his career actually succeeds in becoming the biggest
obstacle
between his film and its emotional impact on an audience. Even the score by John Williams, a
composer who has shown equal brilliance in creating both memorable movie music and movie
music
so understated as to be unnoticeable, is pushed overboard into overscoring the film. For example,
the climactic courtroom speech by Anthony Hopkins features wall-to-wall music that is a
tremendous
distraction from the power of Hopkins' performance.
In the end, it is Hopkins and the male lead of the picture,
newcomer Djimon Hounsou, who make "Amistad" worth experiencing at all. Hounsou is
amazingly
powerful and confident in his feature film debut, embodying the kind of presence in his first movie
that other actors may take decades to establish. It's an especially remarkable performance
considering
that he speaks only three words of English in the entire film. His work is done entirely in the
dialect
of his character's tribe in Africa, placing all of the role's burden onto Hounsou's screen presence
and
physicality. He does an amazing job with his role. As for Hopkins, his work as elder statesman
John
Quincy Adams is nothing short of remarkable. The film's climax is an eleven-minute speech
delivered
by Adams to the U.S. Supreme Court, and it's a stunning piece of acting work.
The best moments in "Amistad," like Hopkins's courtroom
speech and Hounsou's description of his life before his kidnapping in Africa, are powerful not
because
of Spielberg, but in spite of him. Though some performances fall flat, especially the work done by
Morgan Freeman and David Paymer, there is some amazing acting at the heart of this movie that
elevates many scenes past the manipulative, shameless directing tricks of Spielberg. If "Amistad"
is
worth seeing at all, it's because of the performances of tremendous actors like Hounsou and
Hopkins,
not because of the blatant Oscar grandstanding of a director who has distorted the subtlety in his
work beyond recognition.