I'm pretty sure it started out as a joke.
I remember reading a clever little news item on the Web a few weeks
back, in which the writer observed that Twinky Winky, the purple
Teletubby, might be gay. After all, it's purple in color,
has a triangle on top of its head and carries a purse to boot. The
writer even went as far as to contact a representative of Itsy Bitsy
Entertainment, the U.S. distributors of the children's TV show, only to
receive a flustered denial. Pretty funny shit.
But someone apparently didn't get that it was a joke. Recently, ultra
right-wing Bible thumper Reverend Jerry Falwell warned readers of his
magazine that Twinky Winky might be corrupting the souls of Christian
children. "He is purple--the gay-pride color; and his
antenna is shaped like a triangle--the gay-pride symbol," Sherlock
Falwell deduced in his writing.
We could argue with Reverend Falwell logistically -- how could Twinky
Winky be gay? It has no discernible penis to insert into the rectum of a
same-sexed Teletubby. For that matter, it doesn't have a discernible
rectum either -- and the fact that Falwell's comments have caused me to
ponder the anatomy of Teletubby private areas makes me wonder just who
is corrupting whose mind.
Odds are that you couldn't argue with Falwell logistically anyway, so
I've spent some time trying to figure out what drove him to openly
question Twinky Winky's sexual preference: Was it a desperate plea for
publicity? Perhaps. Is Falwell off his rocker? Very possibly. Or, could
it be that Reverend Jerry Falwell is projecting his own inner sexual
demons upon a sweet, innocent children's television icon? Some
psychiatrists would say so.
But Itsy Bitsy Entertainment itself had the most appropriate response
to Falwell's attempt to color Twinky Winky lavender: "To out a Teletubby
in a preschool show is kind of sad on his part. I really find it absurd
and kind of offensive," said Steve Rice. I couldn't agree more.
Now before you religiously inclined readers of this piece fly off the
handle and call me an infidel, there's something you should know: I'm a
Christian too. I worship every Sunday, I love Jesus and I get pissed
off when I hear people making jokes about clergymen and little boys.
But to be associated with Falwell is a down-right embarrassment. It
makes you wonder for a moment whether the Romans might have had a point
when they threw us to the lions.
Do I really think Jerry Falwell might be displacing a lust for men
onto Twinky Winky? No, but I don't think the fact that Twinky Winky
talks with a boy's voice and carries a purse-like magic bag makes it a
fag either. Wanna call T.W. effeminate? Then I'm on your team. And
would there be anything wrong with it if Twinky liked to have a few
beers with Po and take him in the back room to nail his fellow Teletubby
consentingly in the shitter? Frankly, I would't care so long as they
don't tell me about it. I have more important things to worry about than
other people's sexuality. Would Jesus think it's a sin? Maybe, but he'd
forgive Twinky Winky and Po too, because that's the kinda guy he was.
Falwell should spend some more time getting to know his Lord and Saviour
and then he might realize that he should be a little less critical of
innocent Teletubbies and instead focus that energy on some of the
world's real problems, like hunger and poverty.